|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000nam a22000004a 4500 |
| 001 |
849457 |
| 005 |
20031010093200.0 |
| 008 |
010327s2001 nyua b 001 0 eng |
| 097 |
|
|
|3 Bib#:
|a 849457
|
| 010 |
|
|
|a 2001031050
|
| 020 |
|
|
|a 3540418970 (alk. paper)
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DLC) 2001031050
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a 6206888
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (BNAtoc) 2001031050
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (OCoLC)46634119
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DLC
|
| 042 |
|
|
|a pcc
|
| 043 |
|
|
|a e------
|a ec-----
|a ee-----
|
| 050 |
0 |
0 |
|a HC240.25.E85
|b P53 2001
|
| 082 |
0 |
0 |
|a 337.4047
|2 21
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Piazolo, Daniel.
|
| 245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The integration process between Eastern and Western Europe
|
| 260 |
|
|
|a New York :
|b Springer,
|c c2001.
|
| 300 |
|
|
|a xvii, 178 p. :
|b ill. ;
|c 24 cm.
|
| 440 |
|
0 |
|a Kieler Studien ;
|v 310
|
| 504 |
|
|
|a Includes bibliographical references (p. [157]-175) and index.
|
| 505 |
0 |
0 |
|g A.
|t Aim and Scope of the Study --
|g B.
|t Transition and the European Integration Process.
|g I.
|t Overlap and Coincidence between Transition and Integration.
|g II.
|t The Economic Differences between the Advanced Transition Countries and the EU.
|g III.
|t The Institutional Framework for European Integration.
|g IV.
|t The Acquis Communautaire --
|g C.
|t Trade Integration between Eastern and Western Europe.
|g I.
|t The Issue.
|g II.
|t Trade Reorientation of the CEECs since 1989.
|g 1.
|t The Geographical Composition of CEEC Trade.
|g 2.
|t Reshaping of Functional Regions in Europe.
|g III.
|t Expected Long-Term Pattern of CEEC Trade.
|g 1.
|t Estimates Based on a Gravity Model.
|g 2.
|t A Special Role for Trade with Germany?
|g IV.
|t Trade Effects of EU Membership for the CEECs.
|g 1.
|t Complementarity of Trade Structure.
|g 2.
|t Is CEEC-EU Integration Harmful for Third Countries?
|g V.
|t Conclusions.
|g 1.
|t An Alternative Trade Index --
|g 2.
|t An Alternative Hierarchical Clustering Technique --
|g D.
|t Institutional Integration between Eastern and Western Europe.
|g I.
|t The Issue.
|g II.
|t Economic Policy Reforms and Government Credibility.
|g III.
|t Credibility Problems in Central and Eastern Europe.
|g IV.
|t The Link between Institutional Reforms and Economic Growth.
|g V.
|t The Growth Effects of CEEC Accession to the European Union.
|g VI.
|t Conclusions.
|g 1.
|t The Effects of EU Accession on FDI Flows towards the CEECs --
|g 2.
|t The Effects of EU Accession on the Riskiness of Investing in the CEECs --
|g E.
|t Modeling Investment Behavior during Transition.
|g I.
|t The Issue.
|g II.
|t The Transition Problem in CGE Modeling.
|g 1.
|t Static versus Dynamic Models.
|g 2.
|t Accounting for Investment Behavior in CGE Models.
|g III.
|t The Transition-Country Ramsey (TransRams) Model.
|g 1.
|t Basic Features.
|g 2.
|t Implementation for a Transition Economy.
|g 3.
|t Standard Adjustment Cost Function.
|g 4.
|t Augmented Adjustment Cost Function.
|g IV.
|t Conclusions --
|g F.
|t Modeling the Income and Welfare Effects of Accession to the European Union: A Small Dynamic CGE Model for Poland.
|g I.
|t The Issue.
|g II.
|t The Dynamic CGE Model for Poland.
|g 1.
|t Consumption of the Representative Household.
|g 2.
|t Investment Structure.
|g 3.
|t Trade and Capital Flows.
|g 4.
|t Equilibrium Conditions.
|g 5.
|t Database for the PRINCE Model.
|g 6.
|t Calibration for the Dynamic CGE Model for Poland.
|g III.
|t Channels of Membership Effects for Poland.
|g 1.
|t Tariff Reduction and Adoption of the Common External Tariffs of the EU.
|g 2.
|t Reduction in Trade Costs Resulting from Borders.
|g 3.
|t Reduction in Technical Barriers to Trade.
|g 4.
|t Transfers from Brussels.
|g 5.
|t Other Effects.
|g IV.
|t Simulations with the PRINCE Model.
|g 1.
|t Integration Scenarios.
|g 2.
|t Results.
|g 3.
|t Welfare Effects versus Income Effects.
|g 4.
|t Issues for Further Research.
|g V.
|t Conclusions.
|g 1.
|t Sensitivity Analyses --
|g 2.
|t Reductions in the Risk Premium --
|g 3.
|t Solution of the Firm's Intertemporal Optimization Problem in Discrete-Time Formulation --
|g 4.
|t Solution of the Household's Intertemporal Optimization Problem in Discrete-Time Formulation --
|g G.
|t Concluding Remarks.
|g I.
|t Summary.
|g II.
|t Policy Recommendations and Outlook.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a European Union
|z Europe, Eastern.
|
| 650 |
|
0 |
|a European Union
|z Europe, Central.
|
| 651 |
|
0 |
|a Europe, Eastern
|x Economic policy
|y 1989-
|
| 651 |
|
0 |
|a Europe, Central
|x Economic policy.
|
| 651 |
|
0 |
|a Europe
|x Economic integration
|x Econometric models.
|
| 991 |
|
|
|a 2003-10-10
|
| 992 |
|
|
|a Created by sico, 10/10/2003. Updated by , .
|
| 999 |
f |
f |
|i 3a5ddc0e-e46d-5364-aee4-77c03ff4f328
|s dbfe08b5-2175-5d2b-b636-57ffaa453e47
|t 0
|
| 952 |
f |
f |
|p For loan
|a University Of Canterbury
|b UC Libraries
|c Central Library
|d Central Library, Level 9
|t 0
|e HC 240.25 .E85 .P584 2001
|h Library of Congress classification
|i Book
|m AU11024461B
|
