Distributive justice : getting what we deserve from our country / Fred Feldman.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Edition:First edition.
Published: Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2016.
Online Access:
Main Author:
Format: Electronic eBook


LEADER 00000cam a2200000Mi 4500
001 2376408
005 20160923132100.0
006 m o d
007 cr |n|||||||||
008 160830s2016 enk ob 001 0 eng d
035 |a ocn957614787 
097 |3 Bib#:  |a 2376408 
020 |a 9780191826214  |q (electronic bk.) 
020 |a 0191826219  |q (electronic bk.) 
040 |a YDX  |b eng  |e rda  |e pn  |c YDX  |d OCLCO 
050 4 |a HB 523 
082 0 4 |a 339.2  |2 23 
100 1 |a Feldman, Fred,  |d 1941-  |e author. 
245 1 0 |a Distributive justice :  |b getting what we deserve from our country /  |c Fred Feldman. 
250 |a First edition. 
264 1 |a Oxford :  |b Oxford University Press,  |c 2016. 
300 |a 1 online resource (ix, 269 pages.) 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a computer  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a online resource  |2 rdacarrier 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references and indexes. 
520 0 |a This book is a presentation and defense of a novel theory of justice, according to which political economic distributive justice reigns in a state if the government of that state ensures that citizens receive the benefits and burdens they deserve from it. The book starts by giving a more precise characterization of the target of this inquiry—political economic distributive justice. It then proceeds to explicate the concept of desert, evaluate proposed ways of justifying desert claims, formulate a number of desertist theories of justice, and draw out the distinctive features of the version defended here. According to the proposed form of desertism, it is essential to focus on special categories of desert bases and deserts. These are the specifically political economic desert bases and deserts. Justice is explained as the proper distribution of these deserts on these bases. Then this form of desertism is compared to egalitarianism, luck egalitarianism, sufficientism, the difference principle, libertarianism, and prioritarianism, with the aim of showing that desertism yields more attractive results in cases that prove difficult for other theories. Arguments against desertism are explained and evaluated. There is discussion of the distinction between comparative and non-comparative justice. Emphasis is placed on the distinction between theories about the moral rightness of distributions and theories specifically about the justice of distributions. The views of Rawls, Nozick, Parfit, Frankfurt, Feinberg, and others are discussed. A version of the method of reflective equilibrium is explained. The book concludes with admissions concerning puzzles that remain unsolved. 
650 0 |a Distributive justice  |x Philosophy. 
650 0 |a Justice (Philosophy) 
776 0 8 |c Original  |z 9780198782988  |z 0198782985  |w (OCoLC)938360640 
856 4 0 |u https://go.openathens.net/redirector/canterbury.ac.nz?url=http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198782988.001.0001  |y Connect to electronic resource  |t 0 
942 |a 23092016 
945 |b DO NOT SET  |c Automatic 
991 |a 2016-09-23 
992 |a Created by fiwi, 23/09/2016. Updated by fiwi, 23/09/2016. 
999 f f |i 788b22f5-d7b0-5007-aa65-4114de7435d5  |s e2307052-f73e-5e13-8a6d-ccc4f2e3c82f  |t 0